With unemployment the highest for 16 years, income inequality growing faster in the UK
than any other 'rich' economy, cutbacks for decades to come, real wages in decline due to the rising cost
of living, and the Euro heading for the rocks, David Cameron's
speech, in defence of capitalism, at New Zealand House in
London on January 19, must rank as one of his most
ludicrous.
Farcical claims and assertions came aplenty. Cameron said
markets "are the engine of progress, generating
the enterprise and innovation that lifts people out of
poverty and gives people opportunity". That "the
fundamental basis of the market is the idea of something
for something - an idea we need to encourage..."
That capitalism was the "best imaginable force
for improving human wealth and happiness". That
he admired "more than almost anything the
bravery of those who turn their back on the security of a
regular wage to follow their dreams and start a
company". That he wanted to see "socially
responsible and genuinely popular capitalism".
When has capitalism ever been socially responsible or
popular with the working class majority during the last
200 years? Oh yes. I remember. Never!
Does this multi-millionaire politician with a silver-spoon background believe this utter
tripe? Of course not. It's just meant to help prop up the
outdated clapped-out profit-driven economy, to buy time
by suggesting better times ahead, and try to increase UK
competitiveness when global capitalism is in crisis.
Cameron stated that "capitalism will never be
genuinely popular unless there are genuine opportunities
for everyone to participate and benefit", but
when has everyone benefited in capitalism's long history?
It has always been, and always will be, a system that
primarily benefits whichever tiny minority of people own
the means of production and distribution. It can work no
other way, and past attempts by leftwing statist
governments to try to make capitalism fairer have always
resulted in failure. From this fact, you can see that
what Cameron is therefore actually saying, is that
capitalism will never be genuinely popular!
In reality, it isn't markets which are the "engine
of progress", but human ingenuity, planning and
effort. A society is perfectly capable of deciding what
goods and services it needs, making plans to provide
these, and undertaking the required work, all completely
without both markets and money. Far from bringing
progress, capitalism's markets and its money mechanism
frequently bring regression, increasing levels of poverty
and deprivation. There are millions of people on the
unemployment scrap heap because capitalist employers have
got no need for them. In the UK alone, there are also
millions more people in money-related jobs producing
nothing of real benefit for society (those in finance,
banking, insurance, sales, benefits, mortgages,
accountancy, the manufacture of money/ATMs/postage stamps
etc.). All these millions of people are either being
ignored or misused. The notion that this is
"progress" is lunacy.
By completely eradicating backward capitalism, and
replacing it with a new moneyless socialist economy, all
of those currently jobless or doing fundamentally
unproductive money-mad work will all then be available to
contribute something of real value. That's progress!
|